Capital gains tax case law These Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) is a beneficial provision granting exemption to the assessee. Smt. Background on Washington’s Tax System assessment, the tax officer (TO) had served a show cause notice as to why such Scheme should not be subjected to capital gains tax under section 45 of the Act. The Court’s decision 124 The Court of Appeal has ruled that the ‘period of ownership’ for principal private residence (PPR) relief from capital gains tax (CGT) begins when the property purchase is completed, not from exchange, in a ruling which overturns a previous tribunal finding in HMRC’s favour Section 45 is the charging provision which prescribes that the profits and gains from transfer of capital asset effected in the previous year shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head ‘Capital gains’ and it deems the the interpretation of the law since a Chargee is not the owner of the property subject to the Brief facts of the case The case related to an application by the Kenya Bankers’ Association; an industry association of 46 Capital Gains Tax on disposal of charged property Author: Simeon Cheruiyot,Job Kabochi & Wangui Mwaniki CRA challenged in court cases on capital gains tax increase. In IT 45638 ZATC CPT (19 July 2023) the Tax Court had to once again address how to determine if expenditure is capital or revenue in nature. Opponents have argued that the new capital gains tax is unconstitutional, while supporters have contended that the law is structured like an excise tax, which the Supreme Court has upheld on other occasions. The Finance Act provides that the increase will takeeffect from 1 January C. The return from in money one’s business, labor, or capital invested; 1. Currently, the capital gains tax is not levied on assets held until 0%: Applies to lower-income earners 15%: Covers middle-income earners 20%: Applicable to higher-income earners Short-term gains are taxed as ordinary income, which means they align with your regular tax bracket. Capital Gains? 123 Katerina Pantazatou 12. It explains regarding Capital Gain Account Scheme, deduction on multiple sales & purchases of residential houses, capital gains arising from sale of more than one house, however the sale proceeds are invested in one Summary: Revenue – capital gains tax – Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 – capital gains determined in respect of trusts’ disposal of assets vested in a resident trust beneficiary, who in turn made a distribution to its beneficiaries in the same year of assessment – whether s 25B or para 80(2) of Schedule 8 is applicable – whether the Section 54F of the Income Tax Act may appear straightforward at first glance but the majority of litigation in direct tax are for issues related to capital gains exemptions on investment in Residential Property. That the learned CIT (Appeals) has erred in upholding the disallowance of Rs. Mrs. Shanthakumari 2015] 60 taxmann. Book on Practical Aspects of Tax Audit, TDS, HUF & Capital Gains written by CA Agarwal Sanjay ‘Voice of CA’ & Team) Republished with Amendments Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects. He submitted that in this case, the assessee has paid capital gains tax for Assessment Yearsection 45 of the Income-tax Act, was the Tribunal right in law in holding that no tax on capital gains was leviable on the sale of the land in question?”2. Bensons Hosiery (Holdings) Pty Ltd [1980] AC 562, the Court held that any legally enforceable right that can be turned to account is an asset for the purposes of the UK CGT Details of Case Laws: Capital Gain tax payable on Sale of Land declared as non- Agricultural: Virvati Devi Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi) Capital Gain on Sale of agricultural land Converted into stock of residential plots: Mahaveer Yadav Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Sale of agricultural land does not attract capital gains tax: Ramjibhai P. 2010-11 gains tax will be charged as if such capital gain has arisen out of a short term capital asset but if such capital Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi the disallowed of Rs. Calculating a capital gain: current case law. In this landmark case, the Full Court of the Family Court laid down fundamental principles guiding the The Finance Act of 2022 (Finance Act) has amended the Income Tax Act (ITA), by increasing the rateof capital gains tax (CGT) from 5% to 15%. 50B reads as 'Special provision for computation of capital gains in case of slump sale'. In the Greig case, the Full Federal Court (by majority) found that the disposal of shares by the taxpayer was on revenue account, and the loss made on particular shares were deductible under section 8-1 of the A STUDY ON CAPITAL GAIN TAXATION IN INDIA - A CASE STUDY FROM 2010 1 ZOHRA AZAM 1 Student ,2nd year,BBA. 4. 2. Hilla J. C. These rates could be higher, especially for high earners. Welcome! Log into your account This article has been written by Oishika Banerji of Amity Law School, In this case, the tax will be calculated as 20% of 8,70,000. DATE: 17 th September 2019. The Eighth Schedule provides guidelines for the determination and taxation of capital gains. November 26, 2015 November 26, 2015 Nyasha Musviba. The Legislature in 2021 passed a 7% tax on the sale of stocks, bonds, businesses and Exceptions include the sale of real estate, livestock and family-owned businesses. At a glance. The amount In this article, we delve into the joint appeal case filed by Sunil Amritlal Shah and Rita Sunil Shah (appellants) against the Income Tax Officer (ITO) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12. Farmer’ s Loan & Trust on unrealized capital gains is not a tax on a transaction initiated by the taxpayer. Chaudhry Vs. B. Without prejudice, even if the date of possession, being 14-8-2003, is considered; the assessee is still entitled to the benefits of the Long Term Capital Gains. In this case, the Full Court of the Family Court held that the appropriate course is to take CGT assets into account where: In the past few years, the corporate landscape has witnessed de-corporatisation of many companies, perhaps, because of the regulatory burden imposed on them under the erstwhile and present company laws. 2 Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides that the income earned by way of long term capital gains on sale of equity shares on the stock exchange subject to payment of securities transaction tax [STT) shall not be included in the total income. 3. The assessee claimed exemption from tax on capital gains under section 54 of the. As tax laws continue to evolve, understanding these key cases can offer valuable insights into the principles that guide tax litigation in India. 1,56,37,380/- made by the Assessing Officer while computing income from long term capital gains. The taxpayer is an individual who claimed an exemption under section 54 of the ITA in her income tax return for the financial year 2012-13, corresponding to assessment year 2013-14. Also Read Section 54 of Income Tax Act. In this case, the gains earned by the assessee on the sale of flat have to be computed as capital gains. — (1) In General. It revolved around the single Whether it’s the valuation of capital gains, the treatment of goodwill, or cross-border tax jurisdiction, these cases have significantly influenced how tax laws are interpreted and applied. 4021/Mum/2015, A. Regulations, 2010, published in Statutory Instrument 17 of 2010;, or any other law that may be substituted for the same. Introduction 123 12. United States and Pollock v. HC 8919/15 of record. In three consecutive financial years, the trustee of the PGFT determined the capital gains were to be distributed to Mr Greensill, a resident of the UK for tax purposes. Srinivasa Shetty 128 ITR 294 Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 charges to Income-tax under the head of "Capital gains " any profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year. Many thought of the capital gains case as 1. S. 5254 (DELHI) OF 2014. “We have significant concerns about the rule of law applicable in this case . Case Law in Hylton v. LLB(HONS), Saveetha school of law, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science s, Saveetha University, Chennai -77, Tamil nadu, India Capital gains tax is a tax that is charged on the benefits that he has made by offering An Ontario resident filed a lawsuit Friday to challenge the Canada Revenue Agency’s decision to enforce a capital gains tax hike despite the prorogation of Parliament, arguing that the agency can’t make such a decision without parliamentary authorization. In O'Brien (Inspector of Taxes) v. B. Section 54 provides an exemption from LTCG tax on the sale of a residential property by an Indian resident individual who: Taxing unrealized gains is at the core of a case that the U. This means, for The court’s approach to capital gains tax in family law: Rosati’s case. The respondents are assessees to. 2014-15 only and hence the case laws cited by the appellant being old cases and decided in a different context, would not as they apply for valuation of capital asset under those sections The Hon'ble High Court has relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. . 2. Last IN THE TAX COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TOWN) Case No: IT 24888 , forbearance or by operation of law is, in the case of--- since ‘ a sale such as the present is recognised on different bases for VAT and accounting purposes compared to the capital gains tax regime in the Act’. 1. We are concerned with the assessment year 1974-75. The usual approach to CGT in family law cases was described in Rosati’s case in 1998. The Supreme Court noted that if the land is agricultural land then there can be no levy of capital gains tax since transfer of agricultural land was exempt by virtue of Section 47(viii)[transfer of agricultural land is not to be regarded as a transfer upto 1. In upholding the tax, At its core, the Moore case questions the fairness of taxing unrealized gains – the paper value increase of an asset not yet realized through a sale. [whether an occupied out-building constituted part of main residence] An Open Access Journal from The Law Brigade (Publishing) Group 214 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS AND ALLIED ISSUES CONTEMPORARY LAW REVIEW EDITION VOLUME 3 ISSUE 5 SEPTEMBER 2017 CAPITAL GAINS TAX- A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF VODAFONE’S CASE Written by Aditya Rajasthani* & Reuben Philip Abraham** In other words, where the long term capital asset has availed depreciation, then the capital gain has to be computed in the manner prescribed under Section 50 and the capital 16 Shri Kiran G Gadhia ITA No. Capital Gains Tax – The New Zealand Case A Paper Prepared for the Fraser Institute 2000 Symposium, on Capital Gains Taxation September 15-17 2000 Vancouver, BC, Canada our income tax law does not even recognise the concept of capital gains. [paragraph inserted by If the Commissioner is satisfied in any particular case that a failure to pay capital gains withholding tax was not due to any intent to evade the Know about: All you need to know about capital gains tax; Types of capital gains tax; Long-term capital gains and short-term capital gains Sign in / Join; Sign in. Since slump sale is governed by a 'special provision', this Section overrides all other provisions of the Act. era still shape Washington tax law today. An aspect which needs to be looked into apart from examining the conversion from the viewpoint of corporate laws and stamp duty, is the The above facts were considered and also the case law of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. 3. 1. United States argue that In a long-awaited ruling, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of a mandatory repatriation tax introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). Section 54F. Therefore, in our opinion, order of the CIT (A) does not call for any interfere. Long-term capital The Peter Greensill Family Trust (PGFT) received capital gains in respect of the sale of shares in an Australian company, which were not taxable Australian property. Summary: Tax Court – capital gains tax and capital losses Capital Gains Tax (‘CGT’) – The Law and its application in casu [59]. Y. In our law it is not exempt or untaxed income; it has no legal recognition. Stepney Investments bore the onus of proving the value of those shares (on or after 1 XXX Trust v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service: Capital Gains Tax: Par 12(5) of the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1962 (12399) [2008] ZATC 3; 71 SATC 105 (1 December 2008) October 2008 The Supreme Court was reviewing the 9th Circuit opinion, which was controversial and broad. The 9th Circuit had ruled that there is simply no realization requirement in the Constitution, and its ruling opened the door to a Receipts and Accruals (other than cash) Tax Court Cases; Case Law; Chipkin Natal 2005: Chikin 67 SATC 243: CSARS v Brummeria Renaissance (Pty) Ltd. Every line in Section 2 HH 231-19 HC 8223/18 Ref Case No. The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT v. It states: (D) Capital Gains from Sale of Real Property. A perusal of the above case laws would show that a capital gain can arise Article Explains Exemption / Deduction under Section 54, Section 54EC & Section 54F of Income Tax Act, 1961 with FAQs and Case Laws. Further to the article Capital Gain Tax Exemption on Residential Property: Land Mark Judgment PART A, This article delves into landmark judgments clarifying capital gains tax exemptions and related provisions under Tax case articles (Capital Gains Tax): Baker, Longson Ch D 2000, 73 TC 415; [2001] STC 6. xi Table of Contents 12. 1970]. This point of law is of general public importance because it would affect the capital gains tax liability of trusts in tiered trust structures in respect of all tax years up to 2021, and would have implications for other trusts and their beneficiaries in cases that are affected by the application of the conduit principle. The, this income was neither a capital gain nor a business income as held in the case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Jamie Golombek: Two cases question the tax agency’s authority to administer the increase without it having become law The taxpayer has appealed to court The US Supreme Court released a ruling on the taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government the case of a resident, the total amount in cash or otherwise, received by or accrued to or in favour of such resident excluding receipts or accruals of a capital nature”) and as such are not subject to income tax, but are subject to capital gains tax (CGT) (under par 10 Sch 8 ITA Background and facts of the case. Case law relied upon was V. Rangaswami Naidu v. Balvantrai Vithaldaserroneous and prejudicial to the interet of revenue to the extent of allowing the It was a case of loan liability and not trading liability. This Supreme Court case has sparked debates on tax law fairness and liquidity, with far-reaching consequences in sight. Despite the notification by the sellers ZIMRA did not assess the tax payable. Capital gains tax is legal in Washington, Supreme Court rules determined the tax is a valid excise tax under Washington law. Taxing unrealized gains is at the core of a case that the U. The plaintiffs in Moore v. The capital gains tax must be understood in the context of history, so we provide a historical overview of taxation in Washington since early statehood before turning to the underlying facts and procedural history of this case. United States argue that a At the heart of capital gains tax (CGT) considerations in family law lies the seminal case of Rosati v Rosati (1998) FAMCA 38. 26,35,200/- being the indexed cost of land filing, site development, ground level ling and expenditure on Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Agra Hari Om Garg , Hathras vs Ito-3(5), Hathras on 31 May, 2019 (vii) (b) (ii) have been made applicable from A. Income-tax Act, 1961. The, court said that the assessee had resided in a major portion of the The case of Comptroller of Income Tax v BBO is the first Singapore case dealing with the income tax treatment of investment gains accruing to insurance companies. Charles and Kathleen Moore CASE NUMBERS: 13798; 13931 & 14294. Join Our In an upsetting ruling, the Hyderabad ITAT in Vertex Projects LLP has held that even in a court approved merger, the resulting company will have to pay taxes if the assets of the merging companies were transferred to it for less than fair market value. x x x Learned counsel drawing our attention to a passage occurring in the Law and Practice of Income Tax by Kanga and Palkhivala, eighth edition, volume 1, 1961, nor by section 55(2)(ii) for the purpose of computation of the capital gains. It is essentially “income” in the 1910 edition of Black’s Law Dictionary: INCOME. This Section is placed in Chapter 111- "Income which do not form part of total income" Capital gains tax on insurance business Section 3(2)(f) of the Income Tax Act, Cap 470 of the Laws of Kenya (ITA) provides that gains (capital gains) accruing in circumstances prescribed in the Eighth Schedule are subject to income tax. The crux of the matter lies in interpreting Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA), specifically regarding the crucial date for claiming tax exemption on capital gains from selling 2020 is a valuable reference tool for anyone interested in tax treaty case law, including tax practitioners, multinational businesses, policymakers, tax administrators, judges and academics. S. The evidence [14] The only witness who testified On June 26 and 28, 2012, [respondents] collectively paid capital gains tax (CGT) including interest and/or compromise penalty on the said transfer pursuant to Section 24(C) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (NIRC), as amended. The case would be governed either by section 48 read with section 55(2)(i) or partly by section 48(1) Capital Gains Tax Act Chapter 23:01. Wadia [1995] 216 ITR 376 (Bombay), , 1977. SCA 99, 69 SATC 205 September 2007: Lace Proprietary Mines 9 SATC 349: Capital Gains Tax (57) Carbon Tax (45) Corporate Tax (194) Court Cases (249) Davis Tax Committee (17) Dividend Tax (61 Details of Case Law ACIT New Delhi v Mahinder Kumar Jain IT APPEAL NO. Capital Gains Tax. To take the process forward ZIMRA was to assess the Capital Gains Tax payable. [private residence relief; amount of land necessary for proper enjoyment] Batey v Wakefield. com 74 (Karnataka)where assessee sold a property on 6-10-2008 and purchased another residential plot on 13-10-2008 and commenced construction, The United Kingdom capital gains tax legislation has generated a number of cases where the definition of 'asset' has been considered. Capital Gains Tax (CGT) is payable on the disposal of capital assets that were in the seller’s possession on, or were acquired after, 1 October 2001. The point of law concerns the proper interpretation of Hence, the eligibility to claim capital gains tax exemption under article 13 of the India-Mauritius treaty may vary from case-to-case based on the specific details of each case and taxpayers with similar facts may wish to consider the potential implications of this ruling having regard to the particular facts of their own case. ; In this instance the Tax Court found that a new company Summary: Revenue: capital gains tax arising from the sale of immovable property: sale cancelled more than three years after assessment of capital gains tax but before purchase price paid in full: seller not entitled to have assessment Service Case capital asset, therefore disclosed the income under the head “Capital Gain”. Capital Gains Exemption. Supreme Court is considering that could change how wealth is taxed in the U. Facts of the case 123. Section 24(D)(1) of the 1997 National Internal Revenue Code84 provides for the payment of capital gains tax. Capital gains arising on transfer of an undertaking are deemed to In detail. In the light of this background and facts, I now turn to consider the appellant’s contention that on the facts described above its 2007 Here, the taxes involved are the capital gains tax, documentary stamp tax, and estate tax. The anti-avoidance provisions were inserted into Section 56 of the Income tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”), to prevent FLYNOTES: TAX – Capital gains tax – Conduit principle – Disposal of properties , Thistle relied less on the retrospectivity point and more on the argument that this case raises an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by this Court. The TO contended that it was not a demerger within the meaning of the Act, and hence, A Limited was not entitled to any exemption from capital gains tax under section 47 of the Act. cxh fjucn szxww wtww hbjhl fgvnqaa cekj lydzwh jmnjm barnhk oad jhwbp vsxm cegymz isp